Akademik Dersler - Tanıtım

Course Title	Code	Compulsory/Elective	Laboratory + Practice	ECTS
Debate on Digital Societies	SOS629	I. SEMESTER	3+0	7.5

Language of Instruction	Türkçe
Course Type	Elective Courses
Course Instructor(s)	PROF. DR. FUAT GÜLLÜPINAR
Mode of Delivery	The mode of delivery of this course is Face to face
Prerequisites	There is no prerequisite or co-requisite for this course.
Courses Recomended	There are no recommend optional programme components.
Recommended Reading List	Cohen, N. S. (2015). Entrepreneurial journalism and theprecarious state of media work.South Atlantic Quarterly,114(3), 513-533.Zuboff, Shoshana. 2016. “Google as a Fortune Teller: The Secrets of SurveillanceCapitalism.” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, March 5.http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/the-digital-debate/shoshanazuboff-secrets-of-surveillance-capitalism-14103616.html.Herring, S. C., & Kapidzic, S. (2015). Teens, gender, andself-presentation in social media. International encyclopedia ofsocial and behavioral sciences, Oxford: Elsevier.Sobieraj, S. (2018). Bitch, slut, skank, c**: Patternedresistance to women’s visibility in digital publics. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1700-1714.Dreyfus, E. (2018, December 18). Twitter is indeed toxic for women. Amnesty Report. Weber, L. & Seetharaman, A. (2017). The worst job intechnology: Staring at human depravity to keep it off Facebook. Wall Street Journal OnlineHumphreys, L. (2018). Introduction and Chapter 3. InThe qualified self: Social media and the accounting of everyday life.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Gentile, J. (2013, July). “Romantic Deceit via Telegraph:How ‘catfishing’ worked in the 1880s.”The Atlantic Standage, T. (2013). History Retweets: How AncientRomans Created Social Media.Wall Street Journal Latour, B. (1992). Where are the Missing Masses? The Sociologyof a Few Mundane Artifacts. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.),Shaping Technology / Building Society: Studies in SociotechnicalChange (pp. 225–258). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Availableas library e-book:https://proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.01128Winner, L. (1980) Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, Vol. 109,No. 1, Modern Technology: Problem or Opportunity?(Winter,1980), pp. 121-136http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. TheAmerican Economic Review, 75, 332–337.Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. CambridgeJournal of Economics, 34(1), 143–152.https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben057 Mars, R., & Greenspan, S. (2012, April 4). The Arsenal ofExclusion [podcast]. Retrieved August 22, 2017, fromhttp://99percentinvisible.org/episode/episode-51-the-arsenal-ofexclusion/
Assessment methods and criteria	1 Midterm Examination (Written Examination), 1 Final Examination (Written Examination); Achievement criteria is 50 point
Work Placement	Not Appllicable
Catalog Content	Network Society and Theories of Digital Societies: M. Castells, J. Van Dijk; Digitalization and Transformation of Social Relations: Private and public sphere; Privacy and Surveillance; Virtual Communities; Digital Games; Mental Labour Process and Digital Labour; Platforms of Social Media and Revision of Social Sphere; Sociology of Social Media; Politics, Public sphere and democracy on social medya; Fanatism on Internet: Social media and trols; Hatred Speech and Isolated Ghettos in Social Media. Digital Labour and Industry 4.0; Children and Digitalization; Digital World and Addiction; Digitalization and Transformations of Crime: Cybercrime and hackers.